Rather than threatening a "renewed Thatcherite
onslaught" to restrict the rights of the trade unions, Cameron should be
planning the exact opposite. (Tories to restrict strikes in essential
services,10/07/14) With inequality rising, especially with tax avoidance and
evasion increasing, and the "squeeze on earnings drastically underestimated",
union representation on company boards, taking part in collective bargaining and
restoring a semblance of sanity to boardroom pay, is now essential.
Such
co-determination has been in existence in Germany since the 1950s, with the
effect of avoiding major industrial action, acting both as a brake on inequality
and as a method of increasing productivity. Instead of insulting strikers with
absurd comments like the one from Francis Maude that when strikes happen, the
"hard-working people suffer", as if the strikers are lazy, the government would
do better to follow the German example.It`s not just football that Germans are better
at!
As for Labour, the continuing lack of support, as witnessed last Thursday, for unions in their struggle to attain decent standards of living for their members, is becoming embarrassing; can Labour win an election simply because they are not the Tories? Disraeli didn`t only coin the phrase, "One Nation" but also the description of ordinary people as the "Angel in the marble", in the belief that his party
could win the support of the working class and become electorally undefeatable; one of the first Acts of his 1874-80 administration increased trade unions
rights, including one allowing peaceful picketing. Detailed knowledge of history can be useful, Mr Miliband!
Cameron`s Toryism, however, is intent on
destroying the rights of the working people, and so, instead of decent levels of
corporation tax as in the other G7 countries, we have pay freezes and a minimum
wage requiring subsidies from the taxpayer. His pledge to "back tougher strike
laws" if elected in 2015 is a clear indication that he sees nothing wrong with
the disgraceful levels of inequality we now have, and, in fact, intends to
extend the rich-poor divide further. Churchill, with his disgraceful attitude to trade unions, might have agreed, but Disraeli certainly would not have. Neither should Miliband, not if he wants our votes!
No comments:
Post a Comment