Right-wing propaganda tends only to be questioned
when Labour challenges its figures, as was the case recently when the House of
Commons Library corrected Cameron`s NHS waiting times. All too often, even when
politicians like Gove, Duncan-Smith and Jeremy Hunt are rebuked by such bodies
as the UK Statistics Authority for utilising incorrect data, their "message"
gets through. This certainly seems to be true when support is given for grammar
schools.
A recent article in the Guardian covered
the conference of Young Independence, the "Farage Youth" wing of Ukip.
(Guardian,04/08/14) Quotes like "Support for grammar schools brought me to
Ukip", and "I believe in grammar schools" from delegates, clearly with no
personal experience of such schools, revealed how important it is for Labour to
de-bunk the myths surrounding them. This becomes even more pertinent when
examining Gove`s assessment reforms, as many believe the end result of the
education idealogue`s changes would be requests from academies to change
dramatically their entrance requirements, with obvious results: schools with
only 20% of their pupils capable of examination success will be forced to adopt
less rigorous curricula, whilst schools with 80% will force out the minority so
they can concentrate on changing their status to grammar schools and topping
spurious league tables. Equally important, perhaps, are the results of a recent
YouGov poll showing 13% of 18 to 24 year-olds with intentions to vote Ukip in
next years general election; as Conor Pope and Mark Ferguson have both written
in recent Labour List pieces, Labour`s failure "to deal with the Ukip threat"
could lead to "disaster".
The grammar school myth can be challenged
on a number of grounds, but especially on social mobility, examination success
and teaching quality.
Of course, many working class students
achieved success in such schools, and were given opportunites of advancement,
but how many were denied one, and instead, given an inferior education in a
secondary modern, because a test at the age of 11 had designated them as having
no potential? In comprehensive schools, created in the knowledge that students`
intelligence and potential continue to develop after 11, all pupils get an
"opportunity". The fact that social mobility has decreased under this government
has nothing to do with state schools, and everything to do with the blinkered
and biased view taken by employers and universities to the privately
educated.
Grammar schools` examination results were
not as good as they should have been; in my two-form entry grammar school, half
of the pupils were immediately written off and put into the B stream, where the
teachers were even less enthusiastic, the subjects, naturally, "less academic",
and the results woeful. Imagine what they were like in the secondary modern
schools! Even where there were excellent grammar schools, 80% of the children
were denied the chance to gain decent results, and in educational terms, largely
written off. In comprehensive schools, improvements in results, caused by the
hard work of teachers and pupils, have led to Gove`s assessment changes. His
reversion to memory tests, abandonment of coursework and resits, and
re-instating of end-of-course examinations are all indications of Tory
unhappiness with the success of non-selective schools.
As for teaching standards, there can be no
comparison; in the grammar schools of the 50s and 60s, discipline largely was
based on corporal punishment, lessons were boring, and teachers too reliant on
dictation and copying, whilst the schemes of work, lesson planning and inventive
approaches in our current state schools all reflect the huge improvement that
has taken place, in the last 25 years or so, in teaching quality, a fact even
supported by Ofsted!
With the election ever nearer, it becomes
more apparent that Ukip is going to hinder Labour`s chances of a majority, so
every aspect of their policies has to be challenged. Ukip promises to bring
grammar schools back, and Cameron is so desperate he might even do the same.
It`s imperative for Labour to de-bunk the grammar school myth; they denied
millions an opportunity and benefitted very few. Comprehensives and their
teachers have to be supported by Labour. They give every child a
chance!
No comments:
Post a Comment