The Guardian`s editorial listed four "essential facts" about
the Greek agreement, but there can be little to substantiate the dubious point
that the Germans "believe that it could" work (This agreement takes Europe into
dangerous waters,14/07/15). Economically, the deal provides no opportunity
whatsoever for economic growth, debt repayment, or even for hope that the
eurozone will be a more viable unit as a result. The reason for a settlement,
which is not "even remotely reasonable or fair", and which humiliates the Greek
government and its people, has to be based on politics; the conservative
government of Germany, backed by a few like-minded administrations like Finland,
wants to demonstrate to the rest of Europe, above all else, that debt and the
accompanying "severe package" of austerity measures cannot be avoided by
electing a left-wing government. In fact, countries who choose anti-austerity
parties, no matter how democratic the process, have to realise the economic
consequences.
By adopting this tactic, Germany has made a
fateful error; she has forgotten how her treatment after the war by a generous
Europe, terrified of the spread of communism, enabled her economy to recover and
flourish. German economic predominance, now being used as an excuse for
political supremacy, is already, as the editorial states, creating "rancour"
within the EU, which can only increase as long as her intransigence persists.
There is clearly an alternative view growing in Europe that, when debt crises
occur, the borrowers must share some of the blame. Dividing Europe in this way
is particularly mistaken not just because "Putin`s embrace" awaits defaulters,
but because it plays into the hands of nationalist eurosceptics.
No comments:
Post a Comment