Twice in his article, Simon Jenkins describes
Osborne`s "northern inititiative" as "sincere", but where is the evidence to substantiate this (Osborne`s vanity projects
spell doom for the north,25/02/16)? Far more likely is the point that "northern
powerhouse" was clearly an election vote-winning wheeze, which appealed to a
Tory party thinking itself, at best, to be a partner in a coalition government
post-May 2015. Then, of course, the Lib Dems could be blamed for its
shelving. The Guardian recently reported that 83% of the government`s "£300m
relief fund will go to Tory-run councils", mostly in the south; this is not
simply deplorable, but indicative of the ridiculous bias this administration
shows for southern England (Council cuts: PM accused of buying off
MPs,10/02/16).
With none of this extra money designated to
help the "five most deprived councils in the country", all of which
unsurprisingly are in the northern half of England, and with none of the
proposed improvements in transport even off the ground, this ludicrous sham, and
any suggestions of Osborne`s sincerity, must stop
Osborne`s "decision to step up austerity" has
little to do with economics, as demand will be further reduced, and everything
to do with his Tory leadership claims, especially as rivals have been hogging
the news recently. (Independent,27/02/16). Just as Nicky Morgan`s threat to
appoint an American union-baiter as Ofsted chief has nothing to do with
improving education, and Johnson`s decision to run with the Brexit team having
no connection with principle, Osborne is making sure the Tory party does not
forget who makes the so-called "tough" decisions!
No comments:
Post a Comment