Both George Eaton 
and Jason Cowley stressed the "propitious" circumstances, with Labour "fatally 
divided", and the  polls "giving the Conservatives a 21-point lead", in being 
important factors in influencing Theresa May`s election decision, but both 
omitted something equally important (Politics: The greatest gamble, and 
Newsmaker: The Brexit PM seeks a mandate, 21st April, 2017). The situation, both 
economically and socially, is going to get much worse, and by 2020, the British 
public would have seen through the prime minister`s 
duplicity.
      The 
hard Brexit cannot prove beneficial; EU leaders are already pointing out that 
conditions for an ex-member of the European club are bound to be worse than for 
the loyal 27. Why else would May and her ministers spend so much time 
globe-trotting in search of alternative trade deals? Companies are already 
making plans to move headquarters out of London, whilst the government`s 
continued austerity policy intensifies the hardship felt by many, without 
lowering either the debt, or the need for increased 
borrowing.
  Eaton did 
mention the "squeeze on living standards" being on its way, but nothing about 
May failing to put the rhetoric about helping the "just about managing" into 
action, despite the opportunities afforded by two budgets. She can stress the 
need for unity as much as she likes, but an education policy which divides 
pupils at eleven into successes and failures is going to fool 
no-one.
     Let`s face it; May is going to the 
polls now, because the alternative, an election in 2020, is 
unthinkable.
No comments:
Post a Comment