Both George Eaton
and Jason Cowley stressed the "propitious" circumstances, with Labour "fatally
divided", and the polls "giving the Conservatives a 21-point lead", in being
important factors in influencing Theresa May`s election decision, but both
omitted something equally important (Politics: The greatest gamble, and
Newsmaker: The Brexit PM seeks a mandate, 21st April, 2017). The situation, both
economically and socially, is going to get much worse, and by 2020, the British
public would have seen through the prime minister`s
duplicity.
The
hard Brexit cannot prove beneficial; EU leaders are already pointing out that
conditions for an ex-member of the European club are bound to be worse than for
the loyal 27. Why else would May and her ministers spend so much time
globe-trotting in search of alternative trade deals? Companies are already
making plans to move headquarters out of London, whilst the government`s
continued austerity policy intensifies the hardship felt by many, without
lowering either the debt, or the need for increased
borrowing.
Eaton did
mention the "squeeze on living standards" being on its way, but nothing about
May failing to put the rhetoric about helping the "just about managing" into
action, despite the opportunities afforded by two budgets. She can stress the
need for unity as much as she likes, but an education policy which divides
pupils at eleven into successes and failures is going to fool
no-one.
Let`s face it; May is going to the
polls now, because the alternative, an election in 2020, is
unthinkable.
No comments:
Post a Comment