Whilst Jeremy Corbyn prime-ministerially described
the President`s Club "grope-fest" as "an outrageous example of sexual
harrassment under the guise of a charity event" (Morning Star, 24/01/18), I
actually preferred (possibly the one and only time I will ever agree with her)
the description by Tory MP, Margot James. Her criticism of the dinner as an
evening for "slimeballs" was spot-on. What does surprise me, however, is why she
doesn`t use the term more often, as it particularly well describes her fellow
Tory MPs in the Commons.
The dictionary definition of a "slimeball" is a
"repulsive or despicable person", very fitting for people who have deliberately
aimed to hurt the less fortunate in society, as Tory austerity policies have
done. Even worse when it is done whilst conning voters into believing the cuts
were vital to reduce the country`s debt, but ignoring all opportunities
to impose tax increases on the rich! Someone who sets out purposely to make life
more difficult for disabled people is an absolute slimeball - no question. So is
the person who votes against all rented homes being "fit for habitation", which
is what 309 of them did two years ago. How you would describe the 72 of them who
are actually landlords themselves is probably not printable!
Then there are the ones who bray like
constipated hyenas every time Corbyn stands up in parliament to defend the NHS,
or attack the corporate behaviour of greedy CEOs running down pension funds
whilst taking massive pay increases for themselves. Naturally such awful
behaviour in the boardroom leads to similarly disgusting activities in their
clubs.
Is there not room in Labour`s next manifesto
for a pledge to legislate, banning the existence of all male-only
establishments, whether they be for golfers or gropers! It appears that the
prerequisite for membership in all of these places is
"slimeballism"!
No comments:
Post a Comment