If not enough children could jump over a three foot
bar, would the number be increased by raising the bar to four foot? Of course
not, but isn`t this exactly what Gove is doing, in his words, "to improve the
attainment of pupils in England"? Lots of reasons exist to explain England`s low ranking for
numeracy and literacy among 16 to 24 year olds, but none of them is the nature
of the examinations taken by them when they were 16, and the cutting of
resources which limit the amount of early intervention, in places like Sure
Start centres, will only add to the problems.
Increasing rigour, with more emphasis on
grammar, spelling and punctuation in all written examinations, and on such
things as proportion and probability in Maths, could be achieved by a re-wording
of the mark schemes by the examiners.Gove`s wholesale changes of assessment and
content, whilst perhaps adding extra challenge for the brightest, will
only serve to demoralise the average and below-average students. A curriculum
and assessment system,based on ones delivered in 20th century private schools,
will lead to the demise of many subjects incorrectly perceived by right-wing
politicians to have no value in the 21st, and will increase the likelihood of
failure for many pupils, especially those from less affluent
backgrounds.
Taking
education back to a 50s style system, universally seen by educationalists to
have been flawed, must be seen for what it is, an ideologically-driven political
exercise. Words like "planet" and "which" spring to mind when one recalls that
Clegg agreed to give these reforms his party`s approval because there was no
danger of the end-result being a two-tiered system of state education! Without
the intervention of a Labour government intent on upholding equality of
opportunity as one of its fundamental principles, a nationwide system of grammar
schools is the inevitable consequence of Goveism. Unless Labour no longer sees
itself as the champion of comprehensive education, opposition must be voiced to
Gove`s changes immediately; failure to do so will be giving tacit agreement to
an examination system designed to limit the chances of success for children from
working class backgrounds.
No comments:
Post a Comment