The lack of "revolutionary thinking" in economics
(Big business has corrupted our economics, 27/11/12) is largely explained by the
fact that the economies of the major countries are still dominated , either by
bankers, or by politicians in awe of bankers.The fear of a country`s credit
rating being downgraded by the ex-bankers of Standard and Poor etc dominates,
so any consideration for fairness, or even common sense, being applied to
economics tends to be ignored. Osborne continues to ignore the IMF`s warning
about fiscal multipliers for this very reason. As for the debts of Spain and
Greece, what is the point of lending to countries already in debt at interest
levels so high failure to repay is almost guaranteed? Wouldn`t low interest
rates lead both to economic stimulus and repayment? Wouldn`t it be more sensible
for Britain to have loaned Greece some of the £375bn created by QE rather than
give it to the banks? Germany`s exaggerated fears of 1923 hyper-inflation being
repeated have to be dismissed as a merely selfish excuse for looking after
number one.
British economic woes could partly be dealt with by
radical policies, ideologically suppressed by the Tories perhaps, but their fear
of bankers` wrath is only equalled by that of the Labour opposition, too timid
even to moot ideas such as complete tax transparency, a Tobin tax, or a rent
cap. Of course, the current "dogma is particularly agreeable to the elite", but
the main worry is not the lack of radical ideas but the refusal of all main
parties to make a stand against the bankers.Shame on them!
No comments:
Post a Comment