Both Miliband and Axelrod have hinted that the obscene inequality in this country, currently placing Britain 28th in the equality league table out of 34, will play a major role in the general election campaign. So how about, for starters, proposing a sliding scale of income tax, with
45% for £70-149K earners, 50% for £150-200K, 60% for £200-250K, stopping at 80%? It would not seem unreasonable to the majority of people in this country; even
under Thatcher, the rich paid 60% income tax. Support for a Tobin-type tax on
financial transactions, joining with the majority of the EU on this, would be
popular, as would increasing the minimum wage to living wage levels, and
promising legislation to introduce Co-determination, on lines similar to its use
in Germany, with trade union representatives on company boards. Whilst
nationalisation on a large scale will not appear on the manifesto, a proposal
for a state-owned bank and energy company could attract customers with more
attractive rates, simply by having 3% profit margins rather than the 5+% of the
private sector, and thereby force a change of tune from existing providers. The
millions paying a high proportion of their income to profiteering landlords
would welcome their rents being capped at 2010 levels, and also the introduction
of an Ofsted-style inspection authority, to ensure rents are fair and properties
well maintained.
No plans for redistribution of wealth would be
complete without proposals to deal with tax evasion and avoidance, and after
this government`s rhetoric-only approach, making a difference should not be
hard; how about re-employing the thousands of tax inspectors who have lost their
jobs at HMRC and ending "sweetheart deals" for starters? The idea that tax
avoiders of any type should be awarded, or keep when found out, their honours or
right to represent this country, is preposterous. Charitable status for private
schools could also be ended, and money to the Treasury increased by VAT being
imposed on school fees.
We have to hope that Miliband was telling the
truth when he promised a political party different from the others. What is the
point of being a Labour Prime Minister if all you intend to do is tinker rather
than transform?
No comments:
Post a Comment