Tory views of grammar schools have long needed
challenging, if not repudiating; well done Michael Wilshaw!
(Independent,16/12/13) Of course, as David Davis says,many working class
students achieved success in such schools, and were given opportunites of
advancement, but how many were denied one, and instead, given an inferior
education in a secondary modern, because a test at the age of 11 had designated
them as having no potential. In comprehensive schools, created in the knowledge
that students` intelligence and potential continue to develop after 11, all
pupils get an "opportunity". Examination results were not as good as they should
have been; in my two-form entry grammar school, half of the pupils were
immediately written off and put into the B stream, where the teachers were even
less enthusiastic, the subjects, naturally, "less academic", and the results
woeful. Wilshaw`s analysis, for once, can be supported by most
teachers.
The recent laudation of grammar schools was to be
expected because it is increasingly being realised that their return is the
whole point, along with personal political ambition, of Gove`s examination
reforms; schools with only 20% of their pupils capable of examination
success will be forced to adopt less rigorous curricula, whilst schools with 80%
will force out the minority so they can concentrate on topping spurious league
tables. Disappointingly, the penny has yet to drop in all political circles,
hardly surprising perhaps, when so few of our opposition politicians are able to
respond to such Tory propaganda, largely because of their own education
in private schools.
No comments:
Post a Comment