Your editorial on the leadership of the Labour
party rightly states that Miliband needs "to be more proactive and more focused
about pushing his key policies", but ignores the possibility that these "key
policies" may be causing the problem in the first place.(The message from the
polls is that Labour needs to raise its game, not change its leader,11/11/14)
Your statement that there are "no easy fixes for centre-left parties in modern
politics" overlooks an obvious option, which Miliband would be well advised to
consider, to move further from the centre. When he has done this in the past, as
with the energy price freeze pledge, his support in the polls has
increased. On the other hand, having policies
which merely tinker, and change little, there can be neither vision
nor transformation, and the UK after five years of a Miliband government, would
be pretty similar to what it is now, something the electorate clearly
understands.
Joining the other two main party leaders
queueing up to pay homage to the CBI, similar to his actions in Scotland in
referendum week, will only enhance the view that there is little to choose
between them. An £8 an hour minimum wage by 2020 suggests exactly the same.
"Left"-leaning policies, like ending the privatisation and making the City
institutions pay their fair share at last, properly regulating rented property
so that tenants do not pay inflated rents to profiteering Rachman-like
landlords, and allowing the gradual re-nationalisation of railways to proceed
when franchises become available, would at least indicate voters were not
totally being "taken for granted".
The adoption of transformational policies which aim to re-shape society, so that
it works for the common good, and not just for the financial sector and the 1%,
would actually show Labour, not before time, was "raising its game".
Bernie
ReplyDeleteWe think alike
Sid