Labour had been haemorrhaging votes long before the
misguided Thornberry tweet, arguably because the party`s policies revealed the
lack of respect for the working people which Miliband suddenly deems so
important. Policies designed to tinker rather than transform are demeaning in
themselves, especially when opinion polls have made it glaringly obvious that
the electorate strongly favours punishing bankers, re-nationalising railways and
energy providers, and more progressive taxation.
Why didn`t the awful situation in the New Era
estate, where tenants look likely to be evicted if they fail to agree to a 25%
rise in their rents, or the fact that thousands of families are being forced to
live in "temporary accommodation", designed for single nurses or students, for
five years or more, make Ed Miliband angry? What could show more disrespect than
a promise from a potential prime minister that further rent rises will be
capped, but nothing will be done to prevent private landlords continuing their
massive profiteering, at the expense of the people already suffering the most
because of coalition cuts? Even the establishment of an Ofsted-type rented
property inspection unit would show some concern, as would the determination in
government to concentrate on the provision of social housing.
Was Labour`s ire aroused by Gove`s education
reforms? Why not? As Education secretary, he decreased social mobility by
removing modular assessment, coursework and resits, all designed by experts over
many years to create a more level playing field, so vital in promoting equality
of opportunity. In his opinion, students from working class backgrounds were
doing so well in ever improving GCSE and A-level examination results, not
because true abilities were being allowed to flourish, pupils were working
harder, or even the fact that teaching had improved, but because exams were too
easy. How many people, who had been so proud of their children`s
achievements, felt abandoned when Labour`s
response was tacit agreement? Such disrespect, but no anger from
Labour!
Gove even allowed, with next to no argument
from Labour, "free" schools to be set up. They certainly weren`t free in the
sense of costing nothing, as Gove diverted millions to his pet project, away
from their intended destination, the state sector.The fact is these schools,
planned by middle class parents, were designed to be educational havens, free
from working class interference and, above all, free from children seen to be
hindrances to learning and high achievement. Writers for the Sun newspaper might
well have referred to them as "pleb-free". Was the Labour front-bench up in arms
at such class--divisive reforms, was Miliband angrier than ever his colleagues
had seen before? Even now, the privately-educated shadow education minister,
Tristram Hunt, has voiced no plans to close these schools, and transfer their
resources to the state sector, and even Gove`s outrageous examination reforms
look likely to avoid repeal, should there ever be another Labour government.
Isn`t it deeply insulting that a party claiming to be the party of the working
people do nothing to prevent the so-called top universities recruiting the
majority of their intake from private schools, when only 7% of children actually
attend them? If it makes me angry, why doesn`t it have the same effect on
politicians who say they want a fairer society?
If Labour really was the party of the working
people, which it likes us to believe, would not its representatives been present
at the days of industrial action, taken by civil servants, teachers, nurses,
midwives and all those other groups having their standard of living reduced so
that the Tories can reward their friends in the City with tax cuts? Did rage
reverberate around the corridors of Labour HQ when the Tories announced they
would change voting laws making strike action almost impossible? No it didn`t!
We can`t have Labour supporting the people against callous coalitions or greedy
bosses, can we? After all, what would Cameron say about it at
PMQs?
Getting mad with a colleague over tweeting a
photograph of a house decorated with English flags is, almost certainly, too
little, too late; the fact that Labour`s anger was far from obvious when the
coalition government was waging a class war, enforcing austerity and poverty on
those least able to defend themselves whilst enriching the well-off, speaks
volumes. Only now that the Labour leadership and their inept advisers finally
realise that working people are deserting them in droves do they find the need
to "show respect"; it will be a case of putting the bolt in the door of an empty
stable unless policies receive immediate radicalisation.
No comments:
Post a Comment