Whilst Nick Cohen in the Observer is right to question whether Clegg has "the right to call
himself a liberal", if he cannot "support a polite protest" against the BBC, the
answer has long been all too obvious. Clegg and the rest of his party abandoned liberalism the
moment they joined forces with the Bullingdon "posh boys".
Take, for example, that bastion of the
liberal creed, equality of opportunity. Within months of the coalition being
established, the Lib Dems had agreed to a huge rise in university fees and the
ending of the Educational Maintenance Allowance, soon to be followed by them
giving wholehearted support to Gove`s assessment reforms, and his ultimate
objective of a two-tiered system of secondary education. Is it any wonder a
recent report placed Britain bottom of 12 developed OECD countries in a social
mobilty league table, or another placed us 28th out of 34 in an equality one?
But not a word from Clegg on changing the system, where the country`s top jobs
are dominated by the privately educated, despite only 7% of the nation`s
children actually attending private schools.
Gladstone rather ruined the old liberal idea
of laissez-faire, with the Tory, Disraeli, having to legislate in the 1880s to
provide for better housing, safer food and increased rights for trade unions, so
why the Lib Dems have given their support to every single cut and privatisation
measure the Tories have introduced is a mystery, as it must be to all the
party`s supporters. So many vulnerable people have been left unprotected, and so
many workers exploited, not even paid the minimum wage, let alone a living one!
Calling for an increase in the minimum wage now, 15 months before possible
humiliation in the general election, simply won`t wash!
Belief in freedom of speech is being tested
by the Maajid Nawaz case, but the duplicitous Clegg can say what he wants:
greed, he now says, "brought about a banking collapse and misery", yet for three
and a half years he has towed the Tory propaganda line and blamed Labour
policies for the crash! How can they continue to call themselves "Liberal
Democrats" when all liberal principles were long ago sacrificed to the
power-gods?
Data on social mobility give an indication of the degree of equality of opportunity. It is widely believed that in order to achieve significantly higher levels of social mobility significantly greater economic equality is necessary and the Coalition of course are likely to do nothing to increase economic equality which makes all of their [and most notably NIck Clegg's ] statements about the desirability of social mobility essentially meaningless. See here for a useful article
ReplyDeletehttp://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/archives/37431